Showing posts with label clutter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label clutter. Show all posts

How does 'thought' lead to an 'idea'? - 5 December 2012

How does 'thought' lead to an 'idea'? How does it get structured?
Bharat Bhushan - 5 December 2012

How does 'thought' lead to an idea and how does it get structured? How does it move forward? Can it lead to direct action? Can the action be taken almost immediately? How can thought be converted to action?


A thought would break up into several ideas by the nature of its birth, concept and the diversity of 'next-action' that would evolve by themselves. Different ideas would get established as various concepts of their own. These ideas will in turn generate action, and those action points could also be numerous. How many of those ideas can one follow up on? How can one accomplish all that needs to be done? There are some doubts that spring up instantly. Will not multiple thoughts and multiple ideas contribute to clutter in the mind? Will they not disturb the mind? How can the mind keep all such thoughts in separate clusters? How can the mind distinguish thoughts and ideas separately?


There is indeed a linear sequence from 'thought' to a 'possible plan'. Can one jump across from 'thought' directly to the 'plan'? Is that possible? Can one jump across without allowing the idea to be formed? What is the extent of detailed planning that one should do? Should it be in great detail? Sometimes, or most of the time, I feel, that one should not indulge in too much planning. One should go directly to action.

Is there circular motion in one's thoughts? Can one jump?


Can one jump from one aspect to the other without following the sequence? I do not think so. For nothing can happen without any action. What if 'inaction' would lead to some impact? What if there is impact even if we do not know the results? What if we assume that we know the impact of the action that we could have done and without having done so, we determine need for later action?


Minimalism - is there a need to be minimal? - 3 November 2008

Minimalism - is there a need to be minimal? Can one succeed in minimalism? 
Bharat Bhushan - 3 November 2008

Sometime back in 1990, I guess, I had gone to visit a senior journalist friend at his residential quarters above his newspaper offices, and I found him living out of some bare bookshelves, a coir mat and a pillow and very few other accessories. When I questioned him, he said that he was a minimalist. That was the first time that I had heard the word, and I liked it. It seemed to be almost like a religion with him, and I found that he actually believed in living it out in that manner. I was quite taken up by it, and I do try to follow the tenets, from time to time, sometimes succeeding, and mostly, failing.

It is indeed very difficult to become a minimalist. There is an entire science to it, seemingly. The theory or the paradigm is known as minimalism. There are many net pages and material to read from on the internet about minimalism. There are experts out there, and there is software especially made to help you become a minimalist. I would not be surprised if there was a cellphone app also made for it. But, if you go around collecting all this stuff, you would no longer qualify to be a minimalist.

One of the most popular theories is that it is the removal of all the stuff that we collect and getting rid of all the clutter that we live with. This can be at several planes in life. It can be simply to get rid of the material matter that one has collected, and at the other plane, it can be to get rid of the clutter within the mind. It can also be to getting rid of the work systems that do not work for us, and to getting rid of all the wasteful planning methods that we have that destroy our future.

So, simply put, minimalism helps us review our past, the present and the future. We need to get rid of something, some clutter, junk or our belongings, from each aspect, i.e., the past, the present and the future. We collect tremendous aspects of junk within our mind and within our thoughts. We search for vague happenings that have happened a long time ago in the past, and we pull them out, stretch them to more tensile fragility than a simple rubber band, and pretend that it has more importance for the present and the future than it would ever have been.

But, to become a minimalist, and to adopt minimalism, there has to be a deliberate decision. You really need to go ahead and want to do it. It cannot just be a thought and it cannot just be an idea. You need to actually start and get to doing it. There is no planning about becoming a minimalist. You start when you think about it, and you start doing it. Pick up the nearest object, give it away. Pick up your wallet, and decide that you will not purchase anything. Pick up your ATM card or credit card and keep them away for a fortnight. These are simple actions. They help get you started.

When one embarks on the path towards total quality management, the ISO 9001 system requires that the aspirant firm makes a very deliberate top management decision to want to achieve perfection. That is the same with minimalism. Your top management, i.e., your mind and your thought system, should take the decision and make it immediately deliberate by beginning and creating output. One of the theories is that you establish a relay or a tag sport within your house and your office to begin to get rid of stuff. Keep hitting a different spot and continue to pick up something and get rid of it.

We are all consumers. If we do not purchase, if we do not pick up, and if we do not want to take up something or some event, life does not halt at its orbit around our actions. It goes on. The reality is what happens, and it is never the aspect of what did not happen. Whatever did not happen, never existed. It is counter to what does exist. The thought of the aspect that did not exist, will always distract us. Others will contribute to the thoughts and evolve it into a disappointment. Understand the myth and accept the reality. It never existed. THAT is the truth.